Please disable Adblockers and enable JavaScript for domain CEWebS.cs.univie.ac.at! We have NO ADS, but they may interfere with some of our course material.

Literature

Here is an overview of the used literature as well as a list which visualization they have influenced. 
 
  1. Alanen, M., Porres, I.: Di?erence and union of models. In: UML 2003 - The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2863, pp. 2-17. Springer (2003) 
  2. Andrews, K., Wohlfahrt, M., Wurzinger, G.: Visual graph comparison. In: Information Visualisation, 2009 13th International Conference. pp. 62-67 (July 2009) 
  3. Archambault, D.: Structural differences between two graphs through hierarchies. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009. pp. 87-94. GI '09, Canadian Information 
    Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada (2009) 
  4. van den Brand, M., Proti¢, Z., Verhoeff, T.: Generic tool for visualization of model differences. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Model Comparison 
    in Practice. pp. 66-75. IWMCP '10, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010) 
  5. Esgin, E., Senkul, P.: Delta analysis: A hybrid quantitative approach for measuring discrepancies between business process models. In: Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6678, pp. 296?304. Springer (2011) 
  6. Geyer, M., Kaufmann, M., Krug, R.: Visualizing differences between two large graphs. In: Graph Drawing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6502, pp. 393-394. Springer (2011) 
  7. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.: Merging business process models. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6426, pp. 96-113. Springer (2010) 
  8. Ohst, D., Welle, M., Kelter, U.: Diferences between versions of UML diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Software Engineering Conference Held Jointly with 11th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. pp. 227-236. ESEC/FSE-11, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003) 
  9. Treude, C., Berlik, S., Wenzel, S., Kelter, U.: Difference computation of large models. In: Proceedings of the the 6th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on The Foundations of Software Engineering. pp. 295-304. ESEC-FSE '07, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007) 
  10. Aalst, W.: Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for delta analysis and conformance testing. Requirements Engineering 10(3), 198-211 (2005) 
  11. Alanen, M., Porres, I.: Di?erence and union of models. In: UML 2003 - The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2863, pp. 2-17. Springer (2003) 
  12. van Dongen, B., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring similarity between business process models. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5074, pp. 450-464. Springer (2008) 
  13. Nejati, S., Sabetzadeh, M., Chechik, M., Easterbrook, S., Zave, P.: Matching and merging of statecharts specifications. In: Software Engineering, 2007. ICSE 2007. 29th International Conference on. pp. 54-64 (May 2007) 
  14. Mens, T.: A state-of-the-art survey on software merging. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(5), 449-462 (May 2002) 
  15. Zündorf, A., Wadsack, J., Rockel, I.: Merging graph-like object structures. In: Proc. of 10th International Workshop on Software Configuration Management, Toronto, Canada (2001) 
  16. Chawathe, S.S., Garcia-Molina, H.: Meaningful change detection in structured data. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. pp. 26-37. SIGMOD '97, ACM, New York, NY, USA (1997) 
  17. Bunke, H.: On a relation between graph edit distance and maximum common subgraph. Pattern Recognition Letters 18(8), 689-694 (1997) 
  18. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In: Business Process Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5701, pp. 48-63. Springer (2009) 
  19. Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W., Jansen-Vullers, M.: Merging event-driven process chains. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5331, pp. 418-426. Springer (2008) 
  20. Küster, J., Gerth, C., Förster, A., Engels, G.: Detecting and resolving process model differences in the absence of a change log. In: Business Process Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5240, pp. 244-260. Springer (2008) 
  21. Abello, J., van Ham, F., Krishnan, N.: Ask-graphview: A large scale graph visualization system. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 12(5), 669-676 (Sept 2006) 
  22. Di Giacomo, E., Didimo, W., Grilli, L., Liotta, G.: Graph visualization techniques for web clustering engines. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactionson 13(2), 294-304 (March 2007) 
  23. Eades, P., Feng, Q.W.: Multilevel visualization of clustered graphs. In: Graph Drawing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1190, pp. 101-112. Springer (1997) 
  24. JGraph Ltd: JGraph, http://www.jgraph.com/ 
  25. Gansner, E.: Using Graphviz as a Library, Graphviz Library Manual, February 17, 2014 
  26. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A.O., Waldorp, L.J., Schmittmann, V.D., Borsboom, D.: qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software 48(4), 1-18 (5 2012) 
  27. Jablonski, S., Goetz, M.: Perspective oriented business process visualization. In: Business Process Management Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4928, pp. 144-155. Springer (2008) 
  28. Collberg, C., Kobourov, S., Nagra, J., Pitts, J., Wampler, K.: A system for graphbased visualization of the evolution of software. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization. SoftVis '03, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003) 
  29. Kabicher, S., Kriglstein, S., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Visual change tracking for business process models. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. pp. 504-513. ER'11, Springer (2011) 
  30. Alper, B., Bach, B., Henry Riche, N., Isenberg, T., Fekete, J.D.: Weighted graph comparison techniques for brain connectivity analysis. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 483-492. CHI '13, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2013) 
  31. Sebrechts, M.M., Cugini, J.V., Laskowski, S.J., Vasilakis, J., Miller, M.S.: Visualization of search results: A comparative evaluation of text, 2d, and 3d interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. pp. 3-10. SIGIR '99, ACM, New York, NY, USA (1999) 
 
Brightness 
3, 8, 9, 15 
 
Font Size 
8, 17, 24, 25, 26 
 
Line Width 
10, 14, 24, 25 
 
Edge Pattern 
16, 20, 24, 28, 30 
 
Symbols 
11, 12, 13, 18, 24, 25 
 
Background Color 
2, 4, 10, 11, 19, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31 
 
Color 
3, 6, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31 
 
Edge Endings 
1, 8, 16, 24, 25 
 
Node Shape 
5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 21, 23, 24, 25 
Letzte Änderung: 16.07.2015, 11:25 | 978 Worte